CMS-Flow:Eddy Viscosity: Difference between revisions
(Created page with __NOTOC__ In CMS-Flow eddy viscosity is calculated as the sum of a base value math\nu_{0}/math, the current-related eddy viscosity math\nu_c/math and the wave-relate...) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
In CMS-Flow eddy viscosity is calculated as the sum of a base value math\nu_{0}/math, the current-related eddy viscosity math\nu_c/math and the wave-related eddy viscosity math\nu_w/math | In CMS-Flow eddy viscosity is calculated as the sum of a base value <math>\nu_{0}</math>, the current-related eddy viscosity <math>\nu_c</math> and the wave-related eddy viscosity <math>\nu_w</math> | ||
{{Equation|math \nu_t = \nu_0 + \nu_c + \nu_w /math |2=1}} | {{Equation|<math> \nu_t = \nu_0 + \nu_c + \nu_w </math> |2=1}} | ||
The base value for the eddy viscosity is approximately equal to the kinematic eddy viscosity can be changed using the advanced cards (Click [[http://cirp.usace.army.mil/wiki/CMS-Flow_Eddy_Viscosity here]] for further details). | The base value for the eddy viscosity is approximately equal to the kinematic eddy viscosity can be changed using the advanced cards (Click [[http://cirp.usace.army.mil/wiki/CMS-Flow_Eddy_Viscosity here]] for further details). | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
The Falconer (1980) equation is the method is the default method used in the previous version of CMS, known as M2D. | The Falconer (1980) equation is the method is the default method used in the previous version of CMS, known as M2D. | ||
The first is the Falconer (1980) equation given by | The first is the Falconer (1980) equation given by | ||
{{Equation|math \nu_c = 0.575c_b|U|h /math|2= | {{Equation|<math> \nu_c = 0.575c_b|U|h </math>|2=2}} | ||
where | where <math>c_b</math> is the bottom friction coefficient, <math>U</math> is the depth-averaged current velocity, and <math>h</math> is the total water depth. | ||
=== Parabolic Model === | === Parabolic Model === | ||
The second option is the parabolic model given by | The second option is the parabolic model given by | ||
{{Equation|math \nu_c = c_0 u_{*} h /math|2= | {{Equation|<math> \nu_c = c_0 u_{*} h </math>|2=3}} | ||
where | where <math>c_0</math> is approximately equal to <math>\kappa/6</math>. | ||
=== Subgrid Turbulence Model === | === Subgrid Turbulence Model === | ||
The third option for calculating math\nu_c/math is the subgrid turbulence model given by | The third option for calculating <math>\nu_c</math> is the subgrid turbulence model given by | ||
{{Equation|math \nu_{c} = | {{Equation|<math> \nu_{c} = c_0 u_{*} h + c_1 \Delta |\bar{S}| </math>|2=4}} | ||
where | where <math>c_0</math> and <math>c_1</math> are empirical coefficients related the turbulence produced by the bed and horizontal velocity gradients, and <math>\Delta</math> is the average grid area. <math>c_0</math> is approximately equal to 0.0667 (default) but may vary from 0.01-0.2. <math>c_{1}</math> is equal to approximately the square of the Smagorinsky coefficient and may vary from 0.1 to 0.5 (default is 0.4). <math>|\bar{S}|</math> is equal to | ||
{{Equation|math |\bar{S}| = \sqrt{2\bar{S}_{ij}\bar{S}_{ij}} | {{Equation|<math> |\bar{S}| = \sqrt{2\bar{S}_{ij}\bar{S}_{ij}} | ||
= \sqrt{ | = \sqrt{ | ||
2\biggl( \frac{ \partial U}{\partial x} \biggr) ^2 + | 2\biggl( \frac{ \partial U}{\partial x} \biggr) ^2 + | ||
2\biggl( \frac{ \partial V}{\partial y} \biggr) ^2 + | 2\biggl( \frac{ \partial V}{\partial y} \biggr) ^2 + | ||
\biggl( \frac{ \partial U}{\partial y} + | \biggl( \frac{ \partial U}{\partial y} + | ||
\frac{ \partial V}{\partial x} \biggr) ^2 } /math |2=7}} | \frac{ \partial V}{\partial x} \biggr) ^2 } </math> |2=7}} | ||
and | and | ||
{{Equation|math \bar{S}_{ij} = \frac{1}{2} \biggl( \frac{ \partial U_i} { \partial x_j} +\frac{ \partial U_j} { \partial x_i} \biggr) /math |2=8}} | {{Equation|<math> \bar{S}_{ij} = \frac{1}{2} \biggl( \frac{ \partial U_i} { \partial x_j} +\frac{ \partial U_j} { \partial x_i} \biggr) </math> |2=8}} | ||
The subgrid turbulence | The subgrid turbulence model parameters may be changed in the advanced cards EDDY_VISCOSITY_BOTTOM, and EDDY_VISCOSITY_HORIZONTAL. Click [[http://cirp.usace.army.mil/wiki/CMS-Flow_Eddy_Viscosity here]] for further details. | ||
=== | === Mixing Length Model === | ||
The Mixing Length Model implemented in CMS includes a component due to the vertical shear and is given by | |||
{{Equation|<math> \nu_{c} = \sqrt{ (c_0 u_{*} h)^2 + (l_h^2 |\bar{S}|)^2} </math>|2=9}} | |||
where the mixing length <math> l_h </math> is determined by <math> l_h = \kappa \min{c_1,y}</math>, with <math> y </math> being the distance to the nearest wall and <math> c_1 </math> is an empirical coefficient between 0.3-1.2. Eq. (9) takes into account the effects of bed shear and horizontal velocity gradients respectively through the first and second terms on its right-hand side. It has been found that the modified mixing length model is better than the depth-averaged parabolic eddy viscosity model that accounts for only the bed shear effect. | |||
==Wave-Related Eddy Viscosity == | ==Wave-Related Eddy Viscosity == | ||
The wave component of the eddy viscosity is calculated as | The wave component of the eddy viscosity is calculated as | ||
{{Equation|math \nu_w = \Lambda u_w H_s /math|2=2}} | {{Equation|<math> \nu_w = \Lambda u_w H_s </math>|2=2}} | ||
where math\Lambda/math is an empirical coefficient with a default value of 0.5 but may vary between 0.25 and 1.0. math H_s /math is the significant wave height and | where <math>\Lambda</math> is an empirical coefficient with a default value of 0.5 but may vary between 0.25 and 1.0. <math> H_s </math> is the significant wave height and <math>u_w</math> is bottom orbital velocity based on the significant wave height. <math>\Lambda</math> may be changed using the advanced card EDDY_VISCOSITY_WAVE. | ||
Outside of the surf zone the bottom orbital velocity is calculated as | Outside of the surf zone the bottom orbital velocity is calculated as | ||
{{Equation|math u_w = \frac{ \pi H_s}{T_p \sinh(kh) } /math|2=2}} | {{Equation|<math> u_w = \frac{ \pi H_s}{T_p \sinh(kh) } </math>|2=2}} | ||
where | where <math>H_s</math> is the significant wave height, <math>T_p</math> is the peak wave period, <math>k=2\pi/L</math> is the wave number. Inside the surf zone, the turbulence due to wave breaking is considered by increasing the bottom orbital velocity as | ||
{{Equation|math u_w = \frac{ H_s}{2h}\sqrt{gh} /math|2=3}} | {{Equation|<math> u_w = \frac{ H_s}{2h}\sqrt{gh} </math>|2=3}} | ||
---- | ---- |
Revision as of 20:18, 17 January 2011
In CMS-Flow eddy viscosity is calculated as the sum of a base value , the current-related eddy viscosity and the wave-related eddy viscosity
(1) |
The base value for the eddy viscosity is approximately equal to the kinematic eddy viscosity can be changed using the advanced cards (Click [here] for further details).
Current-Related Eddy Viscosity Component
There are four options for the current-related eddy viscosity: FALCONER, PARABOLIC, SUBGRID, and MIXING-LENGTH. The default turbulence model is the subgrid model, but may be changed with the advanced card TURBULENCE_MODEL.
Falconer Equation
The Falconer (1980) equation is the method is the default method used in the previous version of CMS, known as M2D. The first is the Falconer (1980) equation given by
(2) |
where is the bottom friction coefficient, is the depth-averaged current velocity, and is the total water depth.
Parabolic Model
The second option is the parabolic model given by
(3) |
where is approximately equal to .
Subgrid Turbulence Model
The third option for calculating is the subgrid turbulence model given by
(4) |
where and are empirical coefficients related the turbulence produced by the bed and horizontal velocity gradients, and is the average grid area. is approximately equal to 0.0667 (default) but may vary from 0.01-0.2. is equal to approximately the square of the Smagorinsky coefficient and may vary from 0.1 to 0.5 (default is 0.4). is equal to
(7) |
and
(8) |
The subgrid turbulence model parameters may be changed in the advanced cards EDDY_VISCOSITY_BOTTOM, and EDDY_VISCOSITY_HORIZONTAL. Click [here] for further details.
Mixing Length Model
The Mixing Length Model implemented in CMS includes a component due to the vertical shear and is given by
(9) |
where the mixing length is determined by , with being the distance to the nearest wall and is an empirical coefficient between 0.3-1.2. Eq. (9) takes into account the effects of bed shear and horizontal velocity gradients respectively through the first and second terms on its right-hand side. It has been found that the modified mixing length model is better than the depth-averaged parabolic eddy viscosity model that accounts for only the bed shear effect.
Wave-Related Eddy Viscosity
The wave component of the eddy viscosity is calculated as
(2) |
where is an empirical coefficient with a default value of 0.5 but may vary between 0.25 and 1.0. is the significant wave height and is bottom orbital velocity based on the significant wave height. may be changed using the advanced card EDDY_VISCOSITY_WAVE.
Outside of the surf zone the bottom orbital velocity is calculated as
(2) |
where is the significant wave height, is the peak wave period, is the wave number. Inside the surf zone, the turbulence due to wave breaking is considered by increasing the bottom orbital velocity as
(3) |
References
- LARSON, M.; HANSON, H., and KRAUS, N. C., 2003. Numerical modeling of beach topography change. Advances in Coastal Modeling, V.C. Lakhan (eds.), Elsevier Oceanography Series, 67, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 337-365.