CMS-Flow:Eddy Viscosity: Difference between revisions

From CIRPwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with __NOTOC__ In CMS-Flow eddy viscosity is calculated as the sum of a base value math\nu_{0}/math, the current-related eddy viscosity math\nu_c/math and the wave-relate...)
No edit summary
 
(21 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
In CMS-Flow eddy viscosity is calculated as the sum of a base value math\nu_{0}/math, the current-related eddy viscosity   math\nu_c/math and the wave-related eddy viscosity math\nu_w/math
The term ''eddy viscosity'' arises from the fact that small-scale vortices or eddies on the order of the grid cell size are not resolved, and only the large-scale flow is simulated. The eddy viscosity is intended to simulate the dissipation of energy at smaller scales than the model can simulate. In the nearshore environment, large mixing or turbulence occurs due to waves, wind, bottom shear, and strong horizontal gradients. Therefore, the eddy viscosity is an important parameter which can have a large influence on the calculated flow field and resulting sediment transport. In CMS-Flow, the total eddy viscosity <math>(v_t )</math> is equal to the sum of three parts: 1) a base value <math>(v_0 )</math>; 2) the current-related eddy viscosity <math>(v_c )</math>; and 3) the wave-related eddy viscosity <math>(v_w)</math> defined as follows:
      {{Equation|math \nu_t  = \nu_0 + \nu_c + \nu_w /math |2=1}}
 
{{Equation| <math> \nu_t  = \nu_0 + \nu_c + \nu_w </math> |1}}
 
The base value <math>(v_0 )</math> is approximately equal to the kinematic viscosity <math>(\sim 1.81 \ x \ 10^{-6} \ m^2 /s)</math> but may be changed by the user. The other two components <math>(v_c \ and\  v_w )</math> are described in the sections below.
 


The base value for the eddy viscosity is  approximately equal to the kinematic eddy viscosity can be changed using  the advanced cards (Click  [[http://cirp.usace.army.mil/wiki/CMS-Flow_Eddy_Viscosity here]] for  further details).
==Current-Related Eddy Viscosity Component==
==Current-Related Eddy Viscosity Component==
There are four options for the current-related eddy viscosity: FALCONER,  PARABOLIC, SUBGRID, and MIXING-LENGTH. The default turbulence model is the subgrid model, but may be changed with the advanced card  TURBULENCE_MODEL.  
 
There are four algebraic models for the current-related eddy viscosity: 1) Falconer Equation; 2) depth-averaged parabolic; 3) subgrid; and 4) mixing-length. The default turbulence model is the subgrid model but may be changed by the user.


=== Falconer Equation ===
=== Falconer Equation ===
The  Falconer (1980) equation is  the method is the default method used in the previous version of CMS,  known as M2D.
The  Falconer (1980) equation was default method used in earlier versions of CMS (Militello et al. 2004)for the current-related eddy viscosity. The equation is given by  
The first is the  Falconer (1980) equation  given by
      {{Equation|math  \nu_c =  0.575c_b|U|h /math|2=4}}


where  mathc_b/math is the bottom friction  coefficient,  mathU/math is the depth-averaged current velocity, and mathh/math is the total water depth.
{{Equation|<math>\nu_c =  0.575c_b Uh </math>|2}}
 
where  <math>c_b</math> is the bottom friction  coefficient,  <math>U</math> is the depth-averaged current velocity magnitude, and ''h'' is the total water depth.
 
===  Depth-varaged Parabolic Model ===


===  Parabolic Model ===
The second option is the parabolic model  given by
The second option is the parabolic model  given by
      {{Equation|math \nu_c = c_0 u_{*} h   /math|2=5}}
{{Equation|<math>v_c = c_v u_{*c} h </math>|3}}
 
where <math>u_{*c} = \sqrt{\tau_c / \rho}</math> is the bed shear velocity, and <math>c_v</math> is approximately equal to <math>\kappa/6=0.0667</math> but is set as a calibrated parameter whose value can be up to 1.0 in irregular waterways with weak meanders or even larger for strongly curved waterways.
 
===  Subgrid Model ===
The third  option for calculating  <math>\nu_c</math> is the subgrid  turbulence model given by
{{Equation|<math>v_c = c_v u_{*c} h + (c_h \Delta)^2 |\bar{S}| </math>|4}}
 
where:
 
:<math>c_v</math> = vertical shear coefficient [-]
 
:<math>c_h</math> = horizontal shear coefficient [-]
 
:<math>\Delta</math>  = (average) grid size [m]
 
:<math>|\bar{S}| = \sqrt{2e_{ij}e_{ij}}</math>
 
:<math>e_{ij}</math>= deformation (strain rate) tensor <math>= \frac{1}{2} \biggl( \frac{  \partial V_i} { \partial x_j} +\frac{ \partial V_j} { \partial x_i}  \biggr)</math>
 
The empirical coefficients <math>c_v</math> and <math>c_h</math> are related to the turbulence produced by the bed shear and horizontal velocity gradients. The parameter <math>c_v</math> is approximately equal to <math>\kappa/6=0.0667</math> (default) but may vary from 0.01 to 0.2. The variable <math>c_h</math> is equal to approximately the Smagorinsky coefficient (Smagorinsky 1963) and may vary between 0.1 and 0.3 (default is 0.2).


where  mathc_0/math  is approximately equal to  math\kappa/6/math.


=== Subgrid Turbulence Model ===
=== Mixing Length Model ===
The third  option for calculating  math\nu_c/math is the subgrid  turbulence model given by
The Mixing Length Model implemented in CMS for the current-related eddy viscosity includes a component due to the vertical shear and is given by (Wu 2007)
      {{Equation|math  \nu_{c} = \sqrt{ (c_0 u_{*} h)^2  + (c_1  \Delta |\bar{S}|)^2}  /math|2=6}}


where  mathc_0/math and mathc_1/math are  empirical coefficients related the turbulence produced by the bed and  horizontal velocity gradients, and math\Delta/math is  the average grid area. mathc_0/math is approximately  equal to 0.0667 (default) but may vary from 0.01-0.2.  mathc_{1}/math is equal to approximately the square of  the Smagorinsky coefficient and may vary from 0.1 to 0.5 (default is  0.4). math|\bar{S}|/math is equal to
{{Equation|<math>\nu_{c} = \sqrt{ (c_v u_{*c} h)^2  + (l_h^2 |\bar{S}|)^2}</math>|7}}
        {{Equation|math |\bar{S}| = \sqrt{2\bar{S}_{ij}\bar{S}_{ij}}
  = \sqrt{
2\biggl( \frac{ \partial U}{\partial  x} \biggr) ^2  +
  2\biggl( \frac{ \partial V}{\partial  y} \biggr) ^2 +
\biggl(  \frac{ \partial U}{\partial y} +
\frac{ \partial V}{\partial x}  \biggr) ^2 } /math |2=7}}


and
where:
        {{Equation|math \bar{S}_{ij} = \frac{1}{2} \biggl( \frac{  \partial U_i} { \partial x_j} +\frac{ \partial U_j} { \partial x_i}  \biggr) /math |2=8}}


The  subgrid turbulence  model parameters may be changed in the advanced  cards  EDDY_VISCOSITY_BOTTOM, and EDDY_VISCOSITY_HORIZONTAL.
:<math> l_h </math> = the mixing length <math>( = \kappa\ \min(c_h h,y^'))\ [m]</math>


===  Mixing Length Model ===
:<math> y^' </math> =distance to the nearest wall [m]
 
:<math>c_h</math> = horizontal shear coefficient [-]
 
The empirical coefficient <math>c_h</math> is usually between 0.3 and1.2. The effects of bed shear and horizontal velocity gradients, respectively, are taken into account through the first and second terms on the right-hand side of Equation (7). It has been found that the modified mixing length model is better than the depth-averaged parabolic eddy viscosity model that accounts for only the bed shear effect.


==Wave-Related Eddy Viscosity  ==
==Wave-Related Eddy Viscosity  ==
The wave component of the eddy viscosity is calculated as
      {{Equation|math \nu_w = \Lambda u_w H_s  /math|2=2}}


where  math\Lambda/math is an empirical coefficient with a default value of 0.5 but may vary between 0.25 and 1.0. math H_s  /math is the significant wave height and  mathu_w/math is bottom orbital velocity based on the  significant wave height. math\Lambda/math may be changed  using the advanced card EDDY_VISCOSITY_WAVE.
The wave component of the eddy viscosity is separated into two components
{{Equation|<math>\nu_w = c_{wf} u_{ws} H_s + c_{br} h \biggl( \frac{D_{br}}{\rho} \biggr) ^{1/3}</math>|8}}


Outside  of the surf zone the bottom orbital velocity is calculated as
where
      {{Equation|math u_w = \frac{ \pi H_s}{T_p \sinh(kh) }  /math|2=2}}


where mathH_s/math is the significant wave height, mathT_p/math is the peak wave period, mathk=2\pi/L/math is the wave number. Inside the surf zone, the turbulence due to wave breaking is considered by increasing the bottom orbital velocity as
:<math>c_{wf}</math> = wave bottom friction coefficient for eddy viscosity [-]
 
:<math>u_{ws}</math> = peak bottom orbital velocity [m/s] based on the significant wave height <math>H_s</math> [m] and peak wave period <math>T_p</math> [s]
 
:<math>c_{br}</math> = wave breaking coefficient for eddy viscosity [-]
 
:<math>D_{br}</math> = wave breaking dissipation [N/m/s].  
 
The first term on the righ-hand side of Equation (8) represents the component due to bottom friction and the second term represents the component due to wave breaking. The coefficient <math>c_{wf}</math> is approximately equal to 0.5 and may vary from 0.5 to 2.0. The coefficient <math>c_{br}</math> is approximately equal to 0.1 and may vary from 0.04 to 0.15.


      {{Equation|math u_w = \frac{ H_s}{2h}\sqrt{gh}  /math|2=3}}


----
== References ==
== References ==
* LARSON, M.; HANSON, H., and KRAUS, N. C., 2003. Numerical modeling of beach topography change. Advances in Coastal Modeling, V.C. Lakhan (eds.), Elsevier Oceanography Series, 67, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 337-365.
* LARSON, M.; HANSON, H., and KRAUS, N. C., 2003. Numerical modeling of beach topography change. Advances in Coastal Modeling, V.C. Lakhan (eds.), Elsevier Oceanography Series, 67, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 337-365.
 
* Militello, A., C. W. Reed, A. K. Zundel, and N. C. Kraus. 2004. Two-dimensional depth-averaged circulation model M2D: Version 2.0, Report 1, Technical documentation and user's guide. ERDC/CHL TR-04-02. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
* Smagorinsky, J. 1963. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. Monthly Weather Review 93(3):99–164.
----
----
[[CMS#Documentation_Portal |  Documentation Portal]]
[[CMS#Documentation_Portal |  Documentation Portal]]

Latest revision as of 16:41, 18 February 2015

The term eddy viscosity arises from the fact that small-scale vortices or eddies on the order of the grid cell size are not resolved, and only the large-scale flow is simulated. The eddy viscosity is intended to simulate the dissipation of energy at smaller scales than the model can simulate. In the nearshore environment, large mixing or turbulence occurs due to waves, wind, bottom shear, and strong horizontal gradients. Therefore, the eddy viscosity is an important parameter which can have a large influence on the calculated flow field and resulting sediment transport. In CMS-Flow, the total eddy viscosity is equal to the sum of three parts: 1) a base value ; 2) the current-related eddy viscosity ; and 3) the wave-related eddy viscosity defined as follows:

  (1)

The base value is approximately equal to the kinematic viscosity but may be changed by the user. The other two components are described in the sections below.


Current-Related Eddy Viscosity Component

There are four algebraic models for the current-related eddy viscosity: 1) Falconer Equation; 2) depth-averaged parabolic; 3) subgrid; and 4) mixing-length. The default turbulence model is the subgrid model but may be changed by the user.

Falconer Equation

The Falconer (1980) equation was default method used in earlier versions of CMS (Militello et al. 2004)for the current-related eddy viscosity. The equation is given by

  (2)

where is the bottom friction coefficient, is the depth-averaged current velocity magnitude, and h is the total water depth.

Depth-varaged Parabolic Model

The second option is the parabolic model given by

  (3)

where is the bed shear velocity, and is approximately equal to but is set as a calibrated parameter whose value can be up to 1.0 in irregular waterways with weak meanders or even larger for strongly curved waterways.

Subgrid Model

The third option for calculating is the subgrid turbulence model given by

  (4)

where:

= vertical shear coefficient [-]
= horizontal shear coefficient [-]
= (average) grid size [m]
= deformation (strain rate) tensor

The empirical coefficients and are related to the turbulence produced by the bed shear and horizontal velocity gradients. The parameter is approximately equal to (default) but may vary from 0.01 to 0.2. The variable is equal to approximately the Smagorinsky coefficient (Smagorinsky 1963) and may vary between 0.1 and 0.3 (default is 0.2).


Mixing Length Model

The Mixing Length Model implemented in CMS for the current-related eddy viscosity includes a component due to the vertical shear and is given by (Wu 2007)

  (7)

where:

= the mixing length
=distance to the nearest wall [m]
= horizontal shear coefficient [-]

The empirical coefficient is usually between 0.3 and1.2. The effects of bed shear and horizontal velocity gradients, respectively, are taken into account through the first and second terms on the right-hand side of Equation (7). It has been found that the modified mixing length model is better than the depth-averaged parabolic eddy viscosity model that accounts for only the bed shear effect.

Wave-Related Eddy Viscosity

The wave component of the eddy viscosity is separated into two components

  (8)

where

= wave bottom friction coefficient for eddy viscosity [-]
= peak bottom orbital velocity [m/s] based on the significant wave height [m] and peak wave period [s]
= wave breaking coefficient for eddy viscosity [-]
= wave breaking dissipation [N/m/s].

The first term on the righ-hand side of Equation (8) represents the component due to bottom friction and the second term represents the component due to wave breaking. The coefficient is approximately equal to 0.5 and may vary from 0.5 to 2.0. The coefficient is approximately equal to 0.1 and may vary from 0.04 to 0.15.


References

  • LARSON, M.; HANSON, H., and KRAUS, N. C., 2003. Numerical modeling of beach topography change. Advances in Coastal Modeling, V.C. Lakhan (eds.), Elsevier Oceanography Series, 67, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 337-365.
  • Militello, A., C. W. Reed, A. K. Zundel, and N. C. Kraus. 2004. Two-dimensional depth-averaged circulation model M2D: Version 2.0, Report 1, Technical documentation and user's guide. ERDC/CHL TR-04-02. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
  • Smagorinsky, J. 1963. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. Monthly Weather Review 93(3):99–164.

Documentation Portal