East Harbor: Difference between revisions

From CIRPwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:


The goal of this study is to evaluate alternatives for increasing the tidal range in East Harbor, which will improve tidal flushing and water quality. The CMS model will be used to determine not only the effect a variety of inlet configurations will have on the system in terms of flushing but also examine the nearshore response.  Preliminary analysis of the site using a 1D Escoffier – Inlet Equilibrium model (CEA; Seabergh and Kraus ) indicated the stable equilibrium for a natural inlet reopened at the site is approximately 340 m2, and the minimum cross-section is 10 m2. However, the present land ownership limitations at the site are a maximum width of 23 m.  
The goal of this study is to evaluate alternatives for increasing the tidal range in East Harbor, which will improve tidal flushing and water quality. The CMS model will be used to determine not only the effect a variety of inlet configurations will have on the system in terms of flushing but also examine the nearshore response.  Preliminary analysis of the site using a 1D Escoffier – Inlet Equilibrium model (CEA; Seabergh and Kraus ) indicated the stable equilibrium for a natural inlet reopened at the site is approximately 340 m2, and the minimum cross-section is 10 m2. However, the present land ownership limitations at the site are a maximum width of 23 m.  


Questions to be answered by the CMS Modeling study:  
Questions to be answered by the CMS Modeling study:  
1) How big does the inlet need to be to stay open/stable?  
1) How big does the inlet need to be to stay open/stable?  
2) What is the appropriate inlet location and size?
2) What is the appropriate inlet location and size?
3) What is the worst case volume of sand would need to be bypassed?
3) What is the worst case volume of sand would need to be bypassed?
4) What are the likely dimensions of potential structures?
4) What are the likely dimensions of potential structures?


<br  style="clear:both" />
<br  style="clear:both" />

Revision as of 21:52, 3 November 2010

UNDER CONSTRUCTION

Figure 1. East Harbor, Massachusetts, Historical inlet location (a, left) and present-day culvert opening (b, right) (USACE, 1868; MassGIS, 2003) .

East Harbor is an example of a tidally-restricted estuary located north of Truro, Massachusetts, on Cape Cod. The site consists of three main components; Pilgrim Lake, Moon Pond and Salt Meadows. The study will focus on restoring tidal exchange between Cape Cod Bay and Pilgrim Lake/Moon Pond components. The Harbor is connected to Cape Cod Bay by a 2.2 m2 area by 200-m long culvert leading to a poorly flushed marsh area which in turn empties into a lake and marsh system. The original inlet located at the north end of the estuary (Figure 1a) was closed by the construction of a dike in 1869. The motivation behind this closure was to reduce or eliminate the erosion occurring on the seaward side of East Harbor and later provided railroad access to Provincetown (USACE, 1868; NOAA, 2006) Tidal access to the estuary was relocated at the southern end of the estuary with a fixed culvert with dimensions 1.1 m by 2 m (Figure 1b). This closure significantly changed hydrodynamics of the system and sediment transport on Cape Cod Bay and within the estuary.


The goal of this study is to evaluate alternatives for increasing the tidal range in East Harbor, which will improve tidal flushing and water quality. The CMS model will be used to determine not only the effect a variety of inlet configurations will have on the system in terms of flushing but also examine the nearshore response. Preliminary analysis of the site using a 1D Escoffier – Inlet Equilibrium model (CEA; Seabergh and Kraus ) indicated the stable equilibrium for a natural inlet reopened at the site is approximately 340 m2, and the minimum cross-section is 10 m2. However, the present land ownership limitations at the site are a maximum width of 23 m.


Questions to be answered by the CMS Modeling study:

1) How big does the inlet need to be to stay open/stable?

2) What is the appropriate inlet location and size?

3) What is the worst case volume of sand would need to be bypassed?

4) What are the likely dimensions of potential structures?



Model Setup

Since the existing culvert dimensions are 1.1 m x 2 m oval concrete pipe, the telescoping grid will allow for very small grid cell size (0.5 m) while maintaining reasonable computational run time.

No existing wave data has been identified so all wave generation is performed through the CMS-Wave model from wind wave generation.

Table 1. Sediment transport and morphology parameters in the CMS

Parameter Value
Formulation
Sediment Transport Formula
Bed Load Scaling Factor
Suspended Load Scaling Factor
Sediment Porosity
Bed Slope Coefficient
Morphologic Acceleration Factor
Total Load Adaptation Length Method
Adaptation Length


Validation


Discussion




References

  • Watts, I. M., Rosati, J. D., Borelli, M. (2010) "Re-Establishing a Historical Inlet at East Harbor, Cape Cod" Coastal Sediments '11 Conference Proceedings, In Press
  • Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. (1868). “Provincetown Harbor, Massachusetts.” Annual Report of the Secretary of War: Appendix RS, 828-829.

Test Cases

Documentation Portal