CMS-Flow:Boundary Conditions: Difference between revisions

From CIRPwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
= Wall Boundary=
The wall boundary condition is a closed boundary and is applied at any cell face between wet and dry cells. Any unassigned boundary cell at the edge of the model domain is assumed to be closed and is assigned a wall boundary. A zero normal flux to the boundary is applied at closed boundaries. Two boundary conditions are available for the tangential flow:
# Free-slip: no tangential shear stress (wall friction)
# Partial-slip: tangential shear stress (wall friction) calculated based on the log law.
Assuming a log law for a rough wall, the partial-slip tangential shear stress is given by
{{Equation|<math>\tau_{wall} = \rho c_{wall}U^2_\parallel</math>|1}}
where <math>U_\parallel</math> is the magnitude of the wall parallel current velocity, and <math>c_{wall}</math> is the wall friction coefficient equal to
{{Equation|<math>
c_{wall} = \left(\frac{\kappa}{ln(y_P / y_0)} \right)^2
</math>|2}}
Here, <math>y_0</math> is the roughness length of the wall and is assumed to be equal to that of the bed <math>(i.e, y_0 = z_0)</math>. The distance from the wall to the cell center is <math>y_P</math>.
= Water Level =
= Water Level =



Revision as of 17:57, 12 August 2014

Wall Boundary

The wall boundary condition is a closed boundary and is applied at any cell face between wet and dry cells. Any unassigned boundary cell at the edge of the model domain is assumed to be closed and is assigned a wall boundary. A zero normal flux to the boundary is applied at closed boundaries. Two boundary conditions are available for the tangential flow:

  1. Free-slip: no tangential shear stress (wall friction)
  2. Partial-slip: tangential shear stress (wall friction) calculated based on the log law.

Assuming a log law for a rough wall, the partial-slip tangential shear stress is given by

  (1)

where  is the magnitude of the wall parallel current velocity, and is the wall friction coefficient equal to

  (2)

Here, is the roughness length of the wall and is assumed to be equal to that of the bed . The distance from the wall to the cell center is .



Water Level

Water Level and Current Velocity

Tidal Constituent

The water level predictions are based on a harmonic equation with several arguments

  (1)

where is the constituent mean amplitude, is a factor that reduces the mean amplitude and varies in time, are the constituents equilibrium phase and is the constituent phase lag or epoch. Table 1 shows a list of the currently supported tidal constituents in CMS.

Constituent Speed Constituent Speed Constituent Speed Constituent Speed
SA 0.041067 SSA 0.082137 MM 0.54438 MSF 1.0159
MF 1.098 2Q1 12.8543 Q1 13.3987 RHO1 13.4715
O1 13.943 M1 14.4967 P1 14.9589 S1 15
K1 15.0411 J1 15.5854 OO1 16.1391 2N2 27.8954
MU2 27.9682 N2 28.4397 NU2 28.5126 M2 28.9841
LDA2 29.4556 L2 29.5285 T2 29.9589 S2 30
R2 30.0411 K2 30.0821 2SM2 31.0159 2MK3 42.9271
M3 43.4762 MK3 44.0252 MN4 57.4238 M4 57.9682
MS4 58.9841 S4 60 M6 86.9523 S6 90
M8 115.9364

Flux

The water flux is specified as m^3/sec per cell along the cell string. This value is multiplied by the number of cells in the cell string to obtain the total flux. The total flux is then redistributed along the boundary according to

  (2)

Cross-shore

Along a cross-shore boundary, it is assumed that a well-developed longshore current exists. Thus, the y (alongshore) momentum equation can be reduced as follows

  (3)

The water level setup due to waves and winds at the cross-shore boundary can be determined by assuming a zero alongshore gradient of water level, or using the following equation reduced from the x (cross-shore) momentum equation

  (4)

Symbol Description
Time
Constituent mean amplitude
Constituent nodal factor
Constituent equilibrium argument
Constituent equilibrium argument
Constituent phase or epoch

Documentation Portal