Long-wave Runup: Difference between revisions

From CIRPwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 35: Line 35:
Figure 2 shows a comparison of computed and analytical water surface elevations near the shoreline at 4 different time steps.  
Figure 2 shows a comparison of computed and analytical water surface elevations near the shoreline at 4 different time steps.  
‎[[Image:Long-wave_Runup_Water_Level.png|thumb|none|600px| Figure 2. Comparison of calculated and analytical water levels for different time steps. ]]
‎[[Image:Long-wave_Runup_Water_Level.png|thumb|none|600px| Figure 2. Comparison of calculated and analytical water levels for different time steps. ]]
<br  style="clear:both" />
[[Image:Long-wave_Shoreline.png|thumb|none|600px| Figure 2.  Comparison of calculated and analytical water levels for different time  steps. ]]


'''Table 2. Goodness of Fit Statistics'''
'''Table 2. Goodness of Fit Statistics'''

Revision as of 23:32, 14 January 2011

UNDER CONSTRUCTION

Overview

The goal of this verification test to asses the model performance in simulating nonlinear runup/rundown over a plane slopt. Carrier et al. (2003) presented an analytical solution to the nonlinear shallow water equations over a plane slope for several initial wave forms. Here the analytical solution for a the initial wave form given by leading-depression N-wave is used.

Initial Condition

The bed has a constant slope of 1/10 with the initial shoreline located at x=0. Figure 1 shows the initial water level (is given by a leading depression N-wave (characteristic of the waves caused by submarine landslides). The initial current velocity is equal to zero everywhere.

Figure 1. Initial water level


Model Setup

The computational grid has a 3 m resolution for x<300 and increases to 10 m with an aspect ratio of 1.05. The general model parameters used in the simulation are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Model Parameters

Parameter Value
Time step 0.1 s
Ramp period 0.0 s
Drying depth 0.01 m
Wall friction Off
Mixing terms Off
Manning's coefficient 0.0

Results

Figure 2 shows a comparison of computed and analytical water surface elevations near the shoreline at 4 different time steps.

Figure 2. Comparison of calculated and analytical water levels for different time steps.


Figure 2. Comparison of calculated and analytical water levels for different time steps.

Table 2. Goodness of Fit Statistics

Time, s RMSE, m MAE, m R^2 Bias, m
160 0.047 0.461 0.999 -0.069
175 0.058 0.304 0.998 -0.239
220 0.042 0.261 1.000 -0.055


References

  • Carrier, G., Wu, T.T., and Yeh, H. (2003). "Tsunami runup and draw-down on a plane beach", Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 475, 79-99.

Test Cases

Documentation Portal